Building the Skyline: The Birth and Growth of Manhattan’s Skyscrapers

Katharine L. Shester reviews a book by Jason Barr about the development of New York City

In Building the Skyline, Jason Barr takes the reader through a detailed history of New York City. The book combines geology, history, economics, and a lot of data to explain why business clusters developed where they did and how the early decisions of workers and firms shaped the skyline we see today. Building the Skyline is organized into two distinct parts. The first is primarily historical and addresses New York’s settlement and growth from 1609 to 1900; the second deals primarily with the 20th century and is a compilation of chapters commenting on different aspects of New York’s urban development. The tone and organization of the book changes somewhat between the first and second parts, as the latter chapters incorporate aspects of Barr’s related research papers.

Barr begins chapter one by taking the reader on a ‘helicopter time-machine’ ride – giving a fascinating account of how the New York landscape in 1609 might have looked from the sky. He then moves on to a subterranean walking tour of the city, indicating the location of rock and water below the subsoil, before taking the reader back to the surface. His love of the city comes through as he describes various fun facts about the location of the New York residence of early 19th-century vice-president Aaron Burr as well as a number of legends about the city.

Chapters two and three take the reader up to the Civil War (1861-1865), with chapter two focusing on the early development of land and the implementation of a grid system in 1811. Chapter three focuses on land use before the Civil War. Both chapters are informative and well researched and set the stage for the economic analysis that comes later in the book. I would have liked Barr to expand upon his claim that existing tenements* prevented skyscrapers in certain neighborhoods because ‘likely no skyscraper developer was interested in performing the necessary “slum clearance”’. Later in the book, Barr makes the claim that the depth of bedrock** was not a limiting factor for developers, as foundation costs were a small fraction of the cost of development. At first glance, it is not obvious why slum clearance would be limiting, while more expensive foundations would not.

Chapter four focuses on immigration and the location of neighborhoods and tenements in the late 19th century. Barr identifies four primary immigrant enclaves and analyses their locations in terms of the amenities available in the area. Most of these enclaves were located on the least valuable land, between the industries located on the waterfront and the wealthy neighborhoods bordering Central Park.

Part two of the book begins with a discussion of the economics of skyscraper height. In chapter five, Barr distinguishes between engineering height, economic height, and developer height – where engineering height is the tallest building that can be safely made at a given time, economic height is the height that is most efficient from society’s point of view, and developer height is the actual height chosen by the developer, who is attempting to maximize return on investment.

Chapter five also has an interesting discussion of the technological advances that led to the construction of skyscrapers. For example, the introduction of iron and steel skeletal frames made thick, load-bearing walls unnecessary, expanding the usable square footage of buildings and increasing the use of windows and availability of natural light. Chapter six then presents data on building height throughout the 20th century and uses regression analysis to ‘predict’ building construction. While less technical than the research paper on which the chapter is based, it is probably more technical than would be preferred by a general audience.

Chapter seven tackles the ‘bedrock myth’, the assumption that the absence of bedrock close to the surface between Downtown and Midtown New York is the reason for skyscrapers not being built between the two urban centers. Rather, Barr argues that while deeper bedrock does increase foundation costs, these costs were neither prohibitively high nor were they large compared to the overall cost of building a skyscraper. What I enjoyed the most about this chapter was Barr’s discussion of how foundations are actually built. He describes the use of caissons, which enable workers to dig down for considerable distances, often below the water table, until they reach bedrock. Barr’s thorough technological history discusses not only how caissons work, but also the dangers involved. While this chapter references empirical research papers, it is a relatively easy read.

Chapters eight and nine focus on the birth of Midtown and the building boom of the 1920s. Chapter eight contains lengthy discussions of urban economic theory that may serve as a distraction to readers primarily interested in New York. However, they would be well-suited for undergraduates learning about the economics of cities. In the next chapter, Barr considers two of the primary explanations for the building boom of the 1920s – the first being exuberance, and the second being financing. He uses data to assess the viability of these two explanations and finds that supply and demand factors explain much of the development of the 1920s; though it enable the boom, cheap credit was not, he argues, the primary cause.

In the final chapter (chapter 10), Barr discusses another of his empirical papers that estimates Manhattan land values from the mid-19th century to the present day. The data work that went into these estimations is particularly impressive. Toward the end of the chapter, Barr assesses ‘whether skyscrapers are a cause or an effect of high land values’. He finds that changes in land values predict future building height, but the reverse is not true. The book ends with an epilogue, in which Barr discusses the impact of climate change on the city and makes policy suggestions for New York going forward.

* a tenement: a multi-occupancy building of any sort, but particularly a run-down apartment building or slum building

** bedrock: the solid, hard rock in the ground that lies under a loose layer of soil

Questions 27-31

Choose the correct letter, ABC or D.

Write the correct letter in boxes 27-31 on your answer sheet.

27. What point does Shester make about Barr's book in the first paragraph?
28. How does Shester respond to the information in the book about tenements?
29. What does Shester say about chapter six of the book?
30. What does Shester suggest about the chapters focusing on the 1920s building boom?
31. What impresses Shester the most about the chapter on land values?
Questions 32-35

Do the following statements agree with the claims of the writer in Reading Passage 3?

In boxes 32-35 on your answer sheet, write

YES                  if the statement agrees with the claims of the writer

NO                   if the statement contradicts the claims of the writer

NOT GIVEN    if it is impossible to say what the writer thinks about this

32. The description in the first chapter of how New York probably looked from the air in the early 1600s lacks interest.
33. Chapters two and three prepare the reader well for material yet to come.
34. The biggest problem for many nineteenth-century New York immigrant neighbourhoods was a lack of amenities.
35. In the nineteenth century, New York's immigrant neighbourhoods tended to concentrate around the harbour.
Questions 36-40

Complete the summary using the list of phrases, A-J, below.

Write the correct letter, A-J, in boxes 36-40 on your answer sheet.


A. development plans
B. deep excavations
C. great distance
D. excessive expense
E. impossible tasks
F. associated risks
G. water level
H. specific areas
I. total expenditure
J. construction guidelines
36. 36
36
37. 37
37
38. 38
38
39. 39
39
40. 40
40
答案与解析
练习推荐
我的答案
27.
未作答
28.
未作答
29.
未作答
30.
未作答
31.
未作答
正确答案
27.
D
28.
B
29.
C
30.
D
31.
C
题目解析

题目关键词:first paragraph
答案位置:第 1 段第 2 行

题目:第 1 段中,Shester 对 Barr 的书提出了什么观点?
A. 它为城市发展提供了一个非常新颖的解释。 
B. Barr 的研究论文贯穿全书。
C. 其他关于这个主题的书采取的是不同角度。 
D. 它涵盖了一系列影响纽约发展的因素。 
本题考查段落主旨。第 1 段是书评人 Shester 对整本书进行概述,其中介绍到内容时提及这本书从地质、历史、经济等各个角度切入解释纽约的产业和建筑为何是现在的样子,这是本段主旨。接下来分段详细介绍书籍框架和结构。带着主旨在选项中一一比对,或通读整段用细 节信息做排除法,均可解题。
选项 A:highly original 是指作者原创性很强, 即与其他作者截然不同,这在第 1 段并未提及,故排除。

选项 B:第 1 段结尾处明确指出,latter chapters才是 Barr 穿插相关研究论文的章节,故排除。

选项 C:排除思路与选项 A 相同,原文并未提及与其他作者的区别。
选项 D:选项中的 a range of factors 在原文中被细化成为了 geology、history 等词汇,而 affected the development 则对应着原文中 explain why … developed 和 shaped the skyline,因此答案为 D。

题目关键词:tenements
答案位置:第 3 段第 4 行

题目:Shester 是如何回应书中关于廉价公寓的信息的?
A. 她描述了 Barr 感兴趣的原因。
B. 她指出了 Barr 的分析有个潜在问题。
C. 她将 Barr 的结论与其他作家的结论进行比较。

D. 她为 Barr 用于研究的来源提供了细节。
本题考查作者态度问题,需要对原文描述进行概括总结。如果在概括总结方面有困难,也可以在读完整段后凭借细节来做排除法。下面展示两种做题思路。
* 概括总结法:
原文 Shester 概述书的第二、三章之后,切换第一人称“I would have liked …”给出自己的态度,她指出:希望 Barr 能继续阐述(expand upon)“廉价公寓妨碍了某些社区建设摩天大楼”的论点。Shester 为什么希望 Barr 展开讲讲呢,因为她认为,后面章节的内容会让读者乍看之下,搞不清楚(it is not obvious)为什么清理贫民窟会限制开发商。“让读者搞不清楚”, 即是 Shester 的态度,她认为此处 Barr 不展开讲讲会给读者带来疑惑。这与选项 B 中提及 a potential problem 相对应,因此答案为 B。
* 排除法:

选项 A:并未提及 Barr 为何对此有兴趣,排除。
选项 C:并未提及其他作者,排除。
选项 D:书评人并未提供 Barr 研究的任何细节来源,排除。

题目关键词:chapter six
答案位置:第 6 段第 6 行

题目:Shester 对该书第六章的评价是什么? 
A. 它包含矛盾的数据。
B. 它过于关注可能的趋势。
C. 它对大多数读者来说过于专业了。
D. 它所引用的研究已经过时了。
关键词限定范围极小,只有两句话,因此根据原文对照选项选取最为高效。原文在概述了第六章内容之后,提及这些分析可能超出了一般读者的接受范围(more technical than would be preferred by a general audience),这与选项 C 中 too specialized for most reader 表述的是同一个意思,因此答案为 C。

题目关键词:1920s building boom
答案位置:第 8 段第 3 行

题目:Shester 对于主题为 19 世纪 20 年代建筑热潮的章节有何建议?
A. 信息的组织方式应当有所不同。
B. 关于建筑融资方式,需要更多的事实。
C. 对建筑热潮所做的解释难以令人信服。
D. 有些部分对某些人的吸引力有限。 
关键词是明显的年份,易于定位。Shester 在点评建筑热潮这一章时提及,关于城市经济理论的冗长讨论可能会分散一些读者的注意力(distraction to readers),这与选项 D 中 have limited appeal to certain people 相匹配,因此答案 为 D。

题目关键词:impresses … the most, land values
答案位置:第 9 段第 1—3 行

题目:在关于土地价值的章节中,让 Shester 印象最深的是什么?
A. 涵盖的时间段很广。
B. Barr 所提出的有趣问题。 
C. 该主题的研究性质。
D. Barr 对未来提出的建议。
本题答案容易定位,但需要深入思考同义替换。 关于 land values,Shester 表示,特别让她感到印象深刻的(particularly impressive)是,作者做曼哈顿土地价值评估(estimations)时,所做的数据工作(data work),这句话对应本题所问的 What impresses Shester the most… 因此只需在答案中找到 data work 的同义替换即可。选项中并无明显的同义替换,这时可以采用排除 法。选项 A 干扰性较强,时间跨度长跟数据沾 边,但是原文中 Shester 是直接陈述跨度从 mid-19th century to the present day,并没有表明她很 impressive。选项 B 和选项 D 的内容,Shester 在原文中也是直接陈述内容,没有发表看法,因此排除。选项 C 需 要理解研究的性质(nature of research),研究可分为定性的 qualitative 和定量的 quantitative,大量数据工作表明 Barr 采用了定量研究这种研究方法。此外,对 land values 的讨论出自 Barr 的实证研究论文 empirical paper, 这也指出其研究性质,因此答案为 C。

登录后才能看完整解析
立即去登录
正确
错误
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
< 上一题
下一题 >
备考规划